Tampilkan postingan dengan label Jurnal SDM. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Jurnal SDM. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jurnal tentang : PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASIONAL TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA KARYAWAN

Klara Innata Arishanti
Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gunadarma, klara_innata@yahoo.com
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap 75 karyawan PT. X, dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh budaya organisasi dan komitmen organisasional (variabel bebas) terhadap kepuasan kerja (variabel terikat). Analisis data pada penelitian ini menggunakan regresi ganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan dari variabel bebas terhadap variabel terikat. Berdasarkan perhitungan, diketahui pula bahwa rerata skor empirik dari tiap skala yang dibagikan pada subjek menunjukkan bahwa subjek memiliki skor diatas rata-rata pada tiap variabel yang diteliti. Baik budaya organisasi, komitmen organisasional maupun kepuasan kerja dikategorikan cukup tinggi.
Kata Kunci : budaya organisasi, komitmen organisasional, kepuasan kerja, regresi ganda.

ABSTRACT
The research was conducted by involving 75 employees of X Company. The objective is to find out the influence organizational culture and organizational commitment (independent variable) toward job satisfaction (dependent variable). Data were analyzed by using multiple regression. The result indicated that the influence between independence variable and dependence variable is significant. Based on statistics, it is found that the empiric score’s mean of each scale which is divided to subject shows that subject has high score in each observed variable, either the organizational culture, organizational commitment, or job satisfaction. Keywords : organizational culture, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, multiple regression.


Download Jurnalnya

Jurnal SDM: Pengaruh Perilaku Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan Transaksional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Lini Depan Perusahaan Jasa

Studi ini menitikberatkan pada tinjauan terhadap pengaruh perilaku kepemimpinan transformasional dan transaksional terhadap kinerja karyawan lini depan pada perusahaan jasa. Dugaan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perilaku kepemimpinan transformasi mempengaruhi secara positif kinerja karyawan lini depan dan sebaliknya perilaku kepemimpinan transformasi mempengaruhi secara negatif karyawan lini depan. Dugaan yang disusun pada penelitian ini diuji secara empiric terhadap 204 responden yang merupakan karyawan lini depan dan 204 responden yang merupakan pelanggan dari tiga jenis perusahaan jasa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara umum jenis kepemimpinan transformasional berpengaruh positif pada kinerja karyawan lini depan pada perusahaan jasa dan jenis kepemimpinan transaksional berpengaruh negatif. Namun demikian beberapa perilaku pada jenis kepemimpinan transformasional mempengaruhi kinerja karyawan lini depan jasa secara negatif yang berarti menolak hipotesis penelitian. Demikian juga karena perilaku imbalan kontijen dari jenis
kepemimpinan transaksional mempengaruhi secara positif terhadap kinerja tertentu dari karyawan lini depan.
Keywords : Kepemimpinan transformasional, kepemimpinan transaksional, perilaku kinerja, karyawan lini depan.
1. LATAR BELAKANG
Perkembangan industri jasa yang sangat pesat menyebabkan persaingan bisnis jasa menjadi sangat tajam, baik dipasar domestic (nasional) maupun di pasar internasional / global. Untuk memenangkan persaingan, perusahaan harus mampu memberikan kepuasan kepada para pelanggannya, yaitu dengan menghasilkan kualitas pelayanan yang sesuai dengan harapan pelanggan.
Menurut Zeithaml dan Bitner (1996), kepuasan pelanggan dipengaruhi oleh empat faktor, yaitu kualitas layanan, faktor bunga, factor situasi dan faktor pribadi. Dari keempat faktor tersebut, faktor kualitas layanan merupakan salah satu factor penting, karena bagi konsumen jasa, harapan utama mereka adalah mendapatkan pelayanan dengan kualitas yang baik.
Menurut Gronroos (1990) cara untuk meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan adalah dengan memahami dan memperlakukan karyawan lini depan (frontliners) dengan tepat. Karyawan yang memiliki kontak dengan pelanggan
Download Jurnal Selengkapnya disini

Hubungan Antara Persepsi Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Transaksional dengan Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan

(The Correlation Between Transactional - Transformational Leadership Style Perception and Employees’ Job Satisfaction)

Abstract
The main purpose of this research was to examine the correlation between the transactional and transformational leadership style perception and job satisfaction at Coordination Bureau of South Sumatera Credit Cooperation (Badan Koordinasi Koperasi Kredit Daerah Sumatera Selatan). This research employed random sampling technique. The subjects of this research were 100 employees. The data were collected using three questionnaires: the transactional leadership, transformational leadership, and job satisfaction questionnaires. Data were analyzed using multiple regression, partial correlation, Pearson’s Product Moment, and t-test analysis. The result of the research are: (1) the was a very significant and positive correlation between transformational leadership style perception and job satisfaction, (2) there was not significant and negative correlation between transactional leadership style perception with job satisfaction, (3) there was a very significant and positive correlation among transactional and transformational leadership style perception with job satisfaction, and (4) there was a very significant difference in job satisfaction between male and female employees.
Keywords: perception, transactional, transformational, job satisfaction

Pendahuluan
Dewasa ini kepuasan kerja karyawan merupakan salah satu topik yang senantiasa menarik dan dianggap penting, baik oleh ilmuwan maupun praktisi, justru karena kepuasan kerja dipandang dapat mempengaruhi jalannya organisasi secara keseluruhan.
Setiap organisasi memiliki tujuan untuk mencapai kinerja yang seoptimal mungkin. Peningkatan kinerja organisasi yang seoptimal mungkin tidak terlepas dari kepuasan kerja karyawan, sebagai salah satu faktor yang menentukan kinerja organisasi.
Berhadapan dengan usaha peningkatan kepuasan kerja karyawan, salah satu permasalahan dasar adalah bagaimana sebenarnya meningkatkan kepuasan kerja karyawan. Locke (dalam Berry, 1998) mendefinisikan kepuasan kerja sebagai emosi positif atau perasaan senang, sebagai hasil dari penilaian seorang karyawan terhadap faktor pekerjaan atau pengalaman-pengalaman kerjanya. Hal ini bersifat abstrak, sehingga tidak dapat diamati secara langsung (Berry dan Houston, 1993). Menurut Berry (1998); Spector dan Jex (1991)
karyawan yang memiliki kepuasan kerja ditunjukkan oleh sikap yang tidak pernah absen, datang tepat waktu, bersemangat dan memiliki motivasi yang tinggi.
Kepuasan kerja, sebagaimana dikemukakan oleh Riggio (1990), merupakan faktor penting yang mempengaruhi kepuasan hidup karyawan karena sebagian besar waktu karyawan digunakan untuk bekerja. Oleh karena itu, tidaklah mengherankan jika Judge (1993) melihat adanya hubungan erat antara kepuasan kerja, absensi, pemogokan kerja, dan turnover. Selanjutnya, Herzberg (dalam Wixley dan Jukl, 1988) mengemukakan bahwa kepuasan kerja didukung oleh lima faktor yang meliputi: pekerjaan, rekan kerja, gaji dan
kesejahteraan karyawan, promosi, dan pemimpin.

download jurnalnya

Motivation Of Employees: The Pros And Cons Of What Works And Doesn’t

Abstract
Many methods of employee motivation have been developed over the years. The study of employee work motivation has focused on how to motivate the employee as well as the manager. Motivation theories are important to supervisors attempting to be effective leaders, in gaining loyalty and productivity from worker. Motivation has two primary approaches: content and process. Words like: needs, goals, values, culture, management and incentives are all related to motive or motivation. (Mathis & Jackson, 1991, p.80). There are numerous theorists who have put forth diverse theories about motivation, through differing angles and perspectives. The paper’s main focus is to discuss those differing views from the perspective of needs, goals, culture, leadership, and, incentives, as well as to examine models currently used.
Keywords
Motivation, Employee Needs Base, Goal Theory, Incentive Rewards, Performance Appraisals

INTRODUCTION

I am of the realization the motivating employees is a management and leadership issue, often linked to policies, procedures, as well as the structure and cultures of an organization. It begins with human resource management and knowing what the employee is hired to perform. But what is motivation? Why is it important? How can we motivate people, specifically employees? Motivation is the art of getting things done in a manner that meets or surpasses expected standards of performance. It is defined as "an emotion or desire within a person causing a person to act." In essence, people typically act in order to achieve a goal. No organization can achieve anything without people (Drucker, 1999). An Organization is, after all, a body of persons arranged for a specific purpose. Because Management is the efficient and effective utilization of resources, we must think of personnel as the Human Resource - thus, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT. Management is about human beings. Its task is to make people capable of joint performance, to make their strengths effective and their weaknesses irrelevant. This is what organization is all about, and it is the reason that management is the critical, determining factor. The single most important thing to remember about any enterprise is that results exist only on the outside. The result of a business is a satisfied customer. The result of a hospital is a healed patient. The result of a school is a student who has learned something and puts it to work ten years later. Inside an enterprise, there are only costs." (Drucker,1996, pg.31-32).

Since motivation influences productivity, supervisors need to understand what motivates
employees to reach peak performance. It is not an easy task to increase employee motivation because employees respond in different ways to their jobs and their organization's practices. Motivation is the set of processes that moves a person toward a goal. Thus, motivated behaviors are voluntary choices controlled by the individual employee. The supervisor (motivator) wants to influence the factors that motivate employees to higher levels of productivity. Factors that affect work motivation include individual differences, job characteristics, and organizational practices. Individual differences are the personal needs/wants, values, and attitudes, interests and abilities that people bring to their jobs. Job characteristics are the aspects of the position that determine its limitations and challenges. Organizational practices are the rules, human resources policies, managerial practices, and rewards systems of an organization. Supervisors must consider how these factors interact to affect employee job performance.
In the Characteristic Model of Motivation, a job has core dimensions such as skill variety, task identity, autonomy, and feedback. To the extent that these are present in a job, the employee will experience certain psychological states such as experiencing meaningfulness in the work and assume responsibility for outcomes as well as have better knowledge of the actual results of work activities. The more frequent and satisfying these psychological states are, the higher the internal motivation, the better quality the performance, the greater the satisfaction, and the lower the absenteeism and turnover. (Griffin,1999, p 328). This influences performance, affects job satisfaction and affects both physical and mental health. “Who a person is" and what a person is depend on, and reflects the kind of work a person does.
Accepting a job is the crucial factor in integrating the individual into society. It also provides a definition of self that corresponds to their place in society." (Henderson, pg. 49). Workers seek guidance, counseling and direction from management to accomplish tasks and to enhance the quality of life.
download jurnal

Motivating And Managing Generation X And Y On The Job While Preparing For Z: A Market Oriented Approach

ABSTRACT
This article examines the factors that have motivated Generation X and Y over time and the emerging attributes that will be impacting Generation Z. More specifically, two hundred recent graduates and Executive MBA students (Generation X) as well as undergraduates (Generation Y) at Fordham University Schools of Business were surveyed recently and were asked to rank six (out of twenty five) factors they consider most important in motivating them to do their best work on the job. When comparing Generation X and Generation Y, the results are very similar. Both groups rank Respect for me as a person and Good Pay to be their top motivators. While both groups have similar motivators in their top six including Chance for promotion, Opportunity to do interesting work and Opportunity for self-development and improvement, Generation Y differs greatly as Getting along well with others on the job ranked third in their top six. This factor is considered a “hybrid factor” that crosses motivation and maintenance needs. While this “hybrid factor” does not appear as an important motivator among the Baby Boom generation, it is projected that Getting along well with others on the job will be a critical factor especially among Generation Z for a variety of reasons predominately their technical background.

Compared to earlier generations in the work force, Generations X and Y are still motivated more by the prospect of steady employment and a chance for promotion, but getting along well with others on the job has surfaced as a key motivator for Generation Y.
These were the findings of a 2007 survey, conducted by the authors of 200 recent graduates and Executive MBA students (Generation X) and current undergraduates (Generation Y) of Fordham University Schools of Business. The students who participated in the study were asked to rank the six (of 25) factors they consider most important in motivating them to do their best work. (See Figure 1.) The results were compared with the rankings by two groups of business executives, including baby boomers and pre-boomers.
Column A in Figure 1 indicates the rankings by 6,000 managers who were surveyed during a conference in the early 1970s.The managers ranked the following six employment conditions as their principal motivators in the workplace.
1. Respect for me as a person
2. Good pay
3. Opportunity to do interesting work
4. Opportunity for self-development and improvement
5. Large amount of freedom on the job
6. Feeling my job is important
Now compare these results with Column B, the rankings by 500 representatives of different companies and government agencies, who were attending a university executive development program in the mid- 1980s. The factors they considered key motivators are as follows:

1. Respect for me as a person
2. Good pay
3. Opportunity to do interesting work
4. Feeling my job is important
5. Opportunity for self-development and improvement
6. Large amount of freedom on the job
download jurnal